Sometimes I write book reviews for AHP Perspective, a publication of the Association for Humanistic Psychology, and I will reprint them here from time to time. This one was in the December 2007/January 2008 issue. Though Bill Cooke calls his book a dictionary, it is more conspicuously subjective than most reference books. It is a fun book to browse in, whatever your beliefs.
Dictionary of Atheism, Skepticism, and Humanism by Bill Cooke. Prometheus Books, 2006, 606 pp., $75, ISBN 1-59102-299-1
Bill Cooke’s Dictionary of Atheism, Skepticism, and Humanism is a kind of mini-encyclopedia, if you can call a 600-page book “mini,” that covers a wide range of ancient and modern thoughts and beliefs. Cooke peppers his entries with stimulating facts and twists that compel further reading. As with potato chips, it’s hard to consume just one. For instance, examining an entry on humanism leads to subjects of agathonism (a variation of the golden rule) and cosmic perspective, which leads us to winged anchor and so on.
Cooke, who has an entry in his own dictionary, hails from New Zealand and is the author of several books focusing on rationalism and its proponents. He works in the United States at the Center for Inquiry and the State University of New York at Buffalo, among other places. Cooke explains in his preface, “This dictionary is not designed to be a handbook against religion. I have deliberately refrained from a large number of entries about religion.” He intends the book “for free-thinkers in the broadest sense of the word; people who like to think for themselves and not according to preplanned routes set by others.”
Eclectic is one way of describing this dictionary. The subjects are broad ranging, to say the least, with such topics as Gurdjieff, Darwin, dependent arising, the Commonwealth of Nations, and, strangely, metrosexuals. Regarding the latter, Cooke explains that he includes buzzwords to illustrate the evolution of language. Most of the entries are people, ideas and concepts, and events and organizations. There is a “Calendar of Atheism, Skepticism, and Humanism” in the back of the book, listing events month by month. For instance, in January we find both the birth of Thomas Paine in 1737 and the birth of Janis Joplin in 1943. Cooke himself points out that the dictionary is “the product of one person’s curiosity” and is limited in scope.
Fortunately for his readers, the author not only has curiosity but a tremendous sense of fun and humor. In fact, the entry on fun informs us, “One of the more important implications of atheism is the importance of having fun. We only live once, and our life is not a grim preparatory test for some sort of graduation in the sky.” As you can see, Cooke does not keep his opinions to himself in an effort to present this as a dry, factual reference work. It is so packed full of thumbnail sketches of fascinating people, ideas and events, that we are grateful for his lifetime of careful research and experiences in these matters. I, for one, was glad to meet psychologist Margaret Knight (1903-1983) who dared to go on the radio in 1955 to challenge religious beliefs in Britain, paving the way for other humanists to speak up. To read about the Six Suggestions for Religious Believers is to encourage dialogue. Learning with him is itself fun.
Of the values and attitudes that pervade this book, I particularly appreciate Cooke’s egalitarian sensibilities. Not only does he have an entry on feminism, he attends to the rights of women in other entries when relevant, pointing out some consequences to women of various belief systems. He also illuminates sexual hypocrisy wherever he finds it, whether with cult leader David Berg or psychologist Carl Jung.
Humanistic psychologists may be especially interested in the entries on humanist beliefs, values, and virtues (closely followed by an entry on Hummer: “Presumably the last word in selfish, self-defeating consumerism.”). Cooke’s entry on humanistic psychology is slightly critical of Abraham Maslow, ending with the statement, “Maslow coined the word ‘Eupsychia,’ which was his future utopia and was run by (and, it would seem, for) the self-actualized few.” Unitarians have a favorable entry while Quakers are overlooked. Cooke has no entry on Buddhism in general but features a branch called Theravada Buddhism, which he considers “the brand of Buddhism which most accurately reflects the teachings of Siddhartha Gautama” in part because it is “the most atheistic of the great Asian Traditions.” He raises a legitimate question, asking if Buddhism and other Asian Traditions, as he calls them, can even be considered religions when they are not theistic.
Readers will find that they continue reading entries not only for information but to see if they agree with the author. Better than eating chips, you will likely find yourself energized and a bit wiser after delving into this extensive dictionary. At the very least, you will have new questions to explore, both on your own and in dialogue with others.
Barbara Wolf Terao, Ed.D. is a reader of dictionaries and a nonfiction writer. She practices Buddhist humanism, yet believes in more than she can see, thus violating the second and the fourth of The Ten Core Humanist Beliefs. She tries, however, to live up to the other eight, especially the first, stating that humans are part of nature, and the ninth, that life on earth is fragile and requires tending.